2/3/2024 0 Comments Wanted textmate smart![]() you can also use it for all your editing - HTML, python, config files… things that aren’t really suited to General/XCode.Īnd it has many productivity features. It’s faster and more customizable than the General/XCode editor, for one. can you just give a few reasons to use it instead of the default xcode editor? Does it integrate well? It looks really nice from what I’ve tried so far… but could you sell me on why I should use it for all my source editing? Great work… I’ll probably buy it soon. Obviously, General/TextMate’s coloring can be changed to work like SEE’s. OK, I prefer SEE’s default General/ObjC coloring - it colors Cocoa classes (wrong to have framework classes in the language syntax definition, but useful) and it also makes memory management keywords (retain, release, autorelease, copy, alloc, mutableCopy) bold and red. This was going to be a list, but I couldn’t think of anything else! The one thing I miss from General/SubEthaEdit when I use General/TextMate is the functions popup. You could just change General/TextExtras to categorize General/OakTextView instead. General/TextExtras add a new category to General/NSTextView, so no, General/NSTextInput conformance is not enough to get the General/TextExtras features. I know anything I can do with General/TextExtras, I can probably convert to do natively in General/TextMate, but why should I have to? Supporting it would also allow things like General/TextExtras to work with General/TextMate. Here’s a post from the author about the subject: ĭoes General/TextMate conform to the General/NSTextInput protocol? I gather not, from the above. Japanese support is essentially nonexistent). Generally though it seems that piracy is a negligible problem on the Mac (at least that’s my impression based on my current user base, where many are buying the application when they are convinced that it’s for them, and not when the trial expires – but I’ve only been in the business for 2 months, so my views may change down the road ) ).Ī tidbit from the old discussion that I think is somewhat important: General/TextMate does not properly support all languages yet (e.g. I was not able to find the actual program, but this allow ��crackers�� to write a patch simply by writing a property list (given that there is a method which return value can be changed to disable registration checks). ![]() One run-time patch uses something I think was called General/TheAPE, it’s a program using General/UnSanity’s General/ApplicationEnhancer framework and reads a property list describing which classes/methods should be patched to return what. The license scheme I use in General/TextMate for serial numbers is detailed on my blog: – so far I’ve not seen any fake serials, but I have seen binary cracks and some run-time patches to disable the timeout as suggested on General/CocoaInsecurity. It’s written by General/AllanOdgaard who is regularly visiting this wiki, so feel free to ask any Cocoa/programming related questions about General/TextMate on this page (since I’ve already received a few by email ) ). General/TextMate is shareware (39.00 EURO which is about $60.00 US) and there is a 30 days trial. *advanced declarative syntax parsing system which allow for context specific behavior/settings etc., *project management with file outline based on file system structure, *snippets with dynamic content and tab-able placeholders, Some of what General/TextMate brings to a “native” Mac text editor is: ![]() It tries to mimic most of General/NSTextView’s behavior but the reason for ditching it has to do mainly with the fact that it’s a lot more work to make General/NSTextView do what I wanted for General/TextMate than to roll my own. General/TextMate – – is written in Cocoa but has a custom text view (instead of using General/NSTextView).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |